Journal: Advanced Science
Article Title: Single‐Cell Transcriptome Profiling Reveals Conserved IFNγ‐IL8 Signaling‐Induced Antibacterial Neutrophil States during Bacterial Infection
doi: 10.1002/advs.202504840
Figure Lengend Snippet: IFNγ signaling primes neutrophils state transition to il8 + subtype with antibacterial effect in teleost and mammals. (A) SDS‐PAGE assay showing the purification of recombinant tilapia IFNγ protein in Escherichia coli . The lanes from left to right represent protein markers, unpurified IFNγ protein induced by IPTG, and purified IFNγ protein. (B) Gated neutrophils by flow cytometry from tilapia ( n = 3–4), plated in replicates and cultured under unstimulated, LPS‐stimulated, or LPS + IFNγ‐stimulated conditions for 4 h, followed by scRNA‐seq. After quality control, 7,015 cells from control, 11,814 cells from LPS‐stimulated, and 13,523 cells from LPS + IFNγ‐stimulated conditions were retained. (C) UMAP visualization of neutrophil subtype transitions by RNA velocity analyses. Arrows indicate the directionality of the cell‐cell transition matrix computed by CellRank. Cells are color‐coded by subtypes. A total of 32,352 cells from three groups, including 7,015 cells from control, 11,814 cells from LPS‐stimulated, and 13,523 cells from LPS + IFNγ‐stimulated conditions were analyzed. (D) UMAP visualization of Neu‐il8 subtype density by Mellon analysis across control, LPS‐stimulated, and LPS + IFNγ‐stimulated groups. Neu‐il8 subset was circled by the dashed boxes. UMAPs colored by Mellon log density. Density was computed in high‐dimensional cell‐state space (diffusion maps) (E) Bar plot showing the proportions of neutrophil subtypes across unstimulated, LPS‐stimulated, and LPS + IFNγ‐stimulated conditions. Red boxes highlight Neu‐il8 subset. Cell subtypes are color‐coded. (F) UMAP visualization of neutrophils (top panel) overlaid with RNA velocity maps (bottom panel) in humans (unstimulated, IFNγ‐stimulated) and Nile tilapia (unstimulated, LPS‐stimulated, and LPS + IFNγ‐stimulated), analyzed independently. The expression level of IL8 is highlighted in the left‐bottom corner. Arrows indicate the directionality of the cell‐cell transition matrix computed by CellRank. Cell types are color‐coded. (G) Bar plot showing the proportions of neutrophil subtypes in humans and tilapia. Cell types are color‐coded. (H) Scatter plot showing the S. agalactiae CFU recovered from control and Il8 ‐stimulated immune cells (left), and from control and IL8 ‐stimulated dHL‐60 cells (right) (Methods). S. agalactiae was incubated with control and Il8 ‐stimulated immune cells for 5 h, and then plated on BHI agar for CFUs enumeration.
Article Snippet: Similarly, dHL‐60 cells were treated with RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco,11 875 093) containing 10% FBS (Gibco, A3161002C) with 1 and 10 ng mL −1 purified IL8 protein (R&D systems, 208‐IL‐010).
Techniques: SDS Page, Purification, Recombinant, Flow Cytometry, Cell Culture, Control, Diffusion-based Assay, Expressing, Incubation